Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 7:08:25 GMT -1
Payment of salary(although this term is restricted to the form of remuneration for employees, there was payment for the services provided throughout the period, which may or may not be a salary , which will depend on the other elements characterizing the employment relationship), appear in the records freely and clearly. In the case file, there is actually a term of membership (registration form) signed by the complainant, with the expression reference to her status as a member of the cooperative, as well as the labor assignment contract signed by the two defendants, in addition to the Status of the first.e outset, I note that the mere annotation of a supposed autonomous relationship.
In the service provision contract is not definitive for dealing with the controversy. In Labor Law, more than in any other branch of the legal system, the principle of the primacy of reality prevails, with little regard for the Dubai Email List legal name or formal qualification attributed to a given document when, in fact, the real facts challenge or are challenging check the artificial formalities. Examining, therefore, the documentary evidence submitted to the file, I believe that the defendant was unable to fulfill the procedural burden previously assigned to her, as there is no unequivocal demonstration of the absence of legal subordination or the so-called.
Hierarchical dependence By giving a personal statement, the complainant ratified the entire context narrated in the admission document, without reaching a confession regarding the absence of the employment relationship (page 205). The second defendant's representative, in turn, admitted that the complainant, as collector, always worked performing the same services and under the same working conditions, including in the period prior to being hired as an employee, that is, when she was assigned by the first defendant (cooperative). The only difference was in the form of transfer of labor (pages 206/207). The two witnesses.
In the service provision contract is not definitive for dealing with the controversy. In Labor Law, more than in any other branch of the legal system, the principle of the primacy of reality prevails, with little regard for the Dubai Email List legal name or formal qualification attributed to a given document when, in fact, the real facts challenge or are challenging check the artificial formalities. Examining, therefore, the documentary evidence submitted to the file, I believe that the defendant was unable to fulfill the procedural burden previously assigned to her, as there is no unequivocal demonstration of the absence of legal subordination or the so-called.
Hierarchical dependence By giving a personal statement, the complainant ratified the entire context narrated in the admission document, without reaching a confession regarding the absence of the employment relationship (page 205). The second defendant's representative, in turn, admitted that the complainant, as collector, always worked performing the same services and under the same working conditions, including in the period prior to being hired as an employee, that is, when she was assigned by the first defendant (cooperative). The only difference was in the form of transfer of labor (pages 206/207). The two witnesses.